CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905 — Page 501

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Memorandum

The Chinese Government has been informed that the latter will only be recognized if they are made effective and absolute.

In regard to Article III, duties on li-kin levied on goods carried from Hong Kong to the Treaty ports in the Canton Delta, and to Article IV, obligations of Chinese shareholders in foreign Companies, it is reported that no questions have arisen.

Articles XI, XII, and XIII, contain undertakings on the part of His Majesty's Government, and no occasion for their fulfilment has yet presented itself.

The execution of Article VIII, abolition of li-kin and substitution of a surtax on imports depends, as above explained, on the adhesion of all the other Treaty Powers. Article II, the establishment of a uniform national coinage, and Article IX, the revision of the existing Mining Regulations within twelve months from the 5th September, 1902, have not been carried into effect in circumstances which have been dealt with in the earlier part of this Memorandum.

It is stated in the last paragraph of the letter from the Shanghae merchants of the 6th June last, that the Chinese Government and the officials throughout the Empire are now more obstructive in their treatment of British subjects and trade than formerly, and that there is no evidence of any endeavour to carry out either the spirit or the letter of the Treaty.

Lord Lansdowne is informed that His Majesty's Minister at Peking does not share this view.

Differences of opinion from time to time in regard to the interpretation of the Treaties have arisen in the past between His Majesty's Consular officers and the local authorities, and between His Majesty's Legation and the Central Government, but Sir Ernest Satow does not consider that such differences have recently become more numerous than usual.

Foreign Office, October 6, 1905

Other Documents

File Reference Description
FHSL(78)—28903-5960-13-$
50764-SA

No ° . 3938 G No 39389.

(Subject.)

DOMESTIC.

See also 39286.

The Russian fort has now been given up.

I do not see that it is our business to inform them that they have been swindled by their Officers.

Ach: 39286

PUCO R 4 MO 05

An ammunition seized on the "day bhain Seuss copies of letters to Recoman Amer TWO. as to restitution of the food Quaman form.

Edit History

2026-06-24 07:35:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
MemorandumThe Chinese Government has been informed that the latter will only be recognized if they are made effective and absolute.In regard to Article III, duties on li-kin levied on goods carried from Hong Kong to the Treaty ports in the Canton Delta, and to Article IV, obligations of Chinese shareholders in foreign Companies, it is reported that no questions have arisen.Articles XI, XII, and XIII, contain undertakings on the part of His Majesty's Government, and no occasion for their fulfilment has yet presented itself.The execution of Article VIII, abolition of li-kin and substitution of a surtax on imports depends, as above explained, on the adhesion of all the other Treaty Powers. Article II, the establishment of a uniform national coinage, and Article IX, the revision of the existing Mining Regulations within twelve months from the 5th September, 1902, have not been carried into effect in circumstances which have been dealt with in the earlier part of this Memorandum.It is stated in the last paragraph of the letter from the Shanghae merchants of the 6th June last, that the Chinese Government and the officials throughout the Empire are now more obstructive in their treatment of British subjects and trade than formerly, and that there is no evidence of any endeavour to carry out either the spirit or the letter of the Treaty.Lord Lansdowne is informed that His Majesty's Minister at Peking does not share this view.Differences of opinion from time to time in regard to the interpretation of the Treaties have arisen in the past between His Majesty's Consular officers and the local authorities, and between His Majesty's Legation and the Central Government, but Sir Ernest Satow does not consider that such differences have recently become more numerous than usual.Foreign Office, October 6, 1905Other DocumentsFile ReferenceDescriptionFHSL(78)—28903-5960-13-$50764-SANo ° . 3938 G No 39389.(Subject.)DOMESTIC.See also 39286.The Russian fort has now been given up.I do not see that it is our business to inform them that they have been swindled by their Officers.Ach: 39286PUCO R 4 MO 05An ammunition seized on the "day bhain Seuss copies of letters to Recoman Amer TWO. as to restitution of the food Quaman form.
Baseline (Original)
G Chinese Government that the latter will only be recognized if they are made effective and absolute.In regard to Article III, duties on h-kin levied on goods carried from Hong Kong to the Treaty ports in the Canton Delta, and to Article IV, obligations of Chinese shareholders in foreign Companies, it is reported that no questions have arisen.Articles XI, XII, and XIII, contain undertakings on the part of His Majesty's Government, and no occasion for their fulfilment has yet presented itself.The execution of Article VIII, abolition of li-kin and substitution of a surtax on imports depends, as above explained, on the adhesion of all the other Treaty Powers. Article II, the establishment of a uniform national coinage, and Article IX, the revision of the existing Mining Regulations within twelve months from the 5th September, 1902, have not been carried into effect in circumstances which have been dealt with in the earlier part of this Memorandum.It is stated in the last paragraph of the letter from the Shanghae merchants of the 6th June last, that the Chinese Government and the officials throughout the Empire are now more obstructive in their treatment of British subjects and trade than formerly, and that there is no evidence of any endeavour to carry out either the spirit or the letter of the Treaty.Lord Lansdowne is informed that His Majesty's Minister at Peking does not share this view,Differences of opinion from time to time in regard to the interpretation of the Treaties have arisen in the past between His Majesty's Consular officers and the local authorities, and between His Majesty's Legation and the Central Government, but Sir Ernest Satow does not consider that such differences have recently become more numerous than usual.Foreign Office, October 6,1905.0fice or Individual.pligh 1905Lovprevious Paper.FHSL (78) —28903-5960-13-$50764-SAex subsequent Paper.HONGNo ° . 3 9 3 8 G No 39389.(Subject.)494DOMESTIC.c. 0.39003PUCOR 4 MO 05An munition seized on the "day bhainSeuss copies of letters to Recoman Amer TWO. as to restitution of the food Quaman form(Minutes.)ptides breatSee also 39286.od AttiThe Russian fort has now henthe at the ammmation willinfo 4. given up that it is ourI do not save- business fou them that they infan ting swindled by ?theiAch: 39286areAurprobrethOfficers.huSir M. hathan what has beattingthat we will
2026-06-24 07:35:52 · Baseline
View content

G

Chinese Government that the latter will only be recognized if they are made effective and absolute.

In regard to Article III, duties on h-kin levied on goods carried from Hong Kong to the Treaty ports in the Canton Delta, and to Article IV, obligations of Chinese shareholders in foreign Companies, it is reported that no questions have arisen.

Articles XI, XII, and XIII, contain undertakings on the part of His Majesty's Government, and no occasion for their fulfilment has yet presented itself.

The execution of Article VIII, abolition of li-kin and substitution of a surtax on imports depends, as above explained, on the adhesion of all the other Treaty Powers. Article II, the establishment of a uniform national coinage, and Article IX, the revision of the existing Mining Regulations within twelve months from the 5th September, 1902, have not been carried into effect in circumstances which have been dealt with in the earlier part of this Memorandum.

It is stated in the last paragraph of the letter from the Shanghae merchants of the 6th June last, that the Chinese Government and the officials throughout the Empire are now more obstructive in their treatment of British subjects and trade than formerly, and that there is no evidence of any endeavour to carry out either the spirit or the letter of the Treaty.

Lord Lansdowne is informed that His Majesty's Minister at Peking does not share this view,

Differences of opinion from time to time in regard to the interpretation of the Treaties have arisen in the past between His Majesty's Consular officers and the local authorities, and between His Majesty's Legation and the Central Government, but Sir Ernest Satow does not consider that such differences have recently become more numerous than usual.

Foreign Office, October 6, 1905.

0

fice or Individual.

pligh

1905

Lov

previous Paper.

FHSL (78) —28903-5960-13-$

50764-SA

ex subsequent Paper.

HONG

No ° . 3 9 3 8 G No 39389.

(Subject.)

494

DOMESTIC.

c. 0.

39003

PUCO

R 4 MO 05

An munition seized on the "day bhain

Seuss copies of letters to Recoman Amer TWO. as to restitution of the food Quaman form

(Minutes.)

ptides breat

See also 39286.

od Atti

The Russian fort has now hen

the at the ammmation will

info 4. given up

that it is our

I do not save-

business fou

them that they

infan ting swindled by

?

thei

Ach: 39286

are

Aur

probreth

Officers.

hu

Sir M. hathan what has be

atting

that we will

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.